<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Davos:  Nike and partners launch the GreenXchange</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dontapscott.com/2010/01/28/davos-nike-and-partners-launch-the-greenxchange/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dontapscott.com/2010/01/28/davos-nike-and-partners-launch-the-greenxchange/</link>
	<description>A conversation about how the web is changing the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 07:25:08 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Greg Smyth</title>
		<link>http://dontapscott.com/2010/01/28/davos-nike-and-partners-launch-the-greenxchange/comment-page-1/#comment-400</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Smyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dontapscott.com/?p=5201#comment-400</guid>
		<description>I just read your comment about the general feeling toward Mr. Harper and his address in Davos. How would you have responded if you did not agree with the world view on climate change? I am assuming that as a well known writer that you may have doubts as to the validity of climate change. I think Mr. Harper is being very pragmatic in challenging the climate change philosophies and going directly to the economic cost of that philosphy. I think that with more questioning of the authenticity of the climate change information that maybe your point of view might change as it has mine. In any event I enjoy reading your commentaries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read your comment about the general feeling toward Mr. Harper and his address in Davos. How would you have responded if you did not agree with the world view on climate change? I am assuming that as a well known writer that you may have doubts as to the validity of climate change. I think Mr. Harper is being very pragmatic in challenging the climate change philosophies and going directly to the economic cost of that philosphy. I think that with more questioning of the authenticity of the climate change information that maybe your point of view might change as it has mine. In any event I enjoy reading your commentaries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
