<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google raises the bar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dontapscott.com/2010/02/12/google-raises-the-bar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dontapscott.com/2010/02/12/google-raises-the-bar/</link>
	<description>A conversation about how the web is changing the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:15:27 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Entropy</title>
		<link>http://dontapscott.com/2010/02/12/google-raises-the-bar/comment-page-1/#comment-420</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Entropy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Feb 2010 02:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dontapscott.com/?p=5225#comment-420</guid>
		<description>Last I knew, Google wasn&#039;t an ISP. How does it propose to lay and connect these pipes to households and businesses? This Googlue prospectus is dangerous hubris. The company&#039;s ambitions must be nipped. If Net Neutrality means keeping utilities and content providers separate, why should Google be allowed to operate the physical layers in the face of its metaphysical dominance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last I knew, Google wasn&#39;t an ISP. How does it propose to lay and connect these pipes to households and businesses? This Googlue prospectus is dangerous hubris. The company&#39;s ambitions must be nipped. If Net Neutrality means keeping utilities and content providers separate, why should Google be allowed to operate the physical layers in the face of its metaphysical dominance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
